Either unconditionally accepted or would have to let the phone to become "Big Brother". For consumers, there is no "voluntary" at all. Unicom will place itself in the position of the boss. Because his brother to move to do so, in China can not be replaced by someone. Factors of equality between the mobile phone users with Unicom does not exist. "Equality" is based on the non-monopoly case, there is no elimination of absolute monopoly on the establishment of "equality" as a bridge between business and consumers. "Fairness" of course does not exist. Because Unicom pricing, national "one size fits all", no matter where are 5 yuan, there is no room for negotiation. Here is the anti-explosive cell phone jammer .
Supposedly is 5 yuan or 10 yuan, or just two yuan, in full consultation with the mobile phone users can not arbitrarily set a price. Or how to say this is unfair. As for the "good faith", China Unicom, the company has done even more authentic. In Xuzhou hearing the case, the plaintiff, that the purchase of services with China Unicom, China Unicom did not inform the "Caller ID" charges may apply, and even reminded not suddenly put away the fee to This is dishonest, disloyal. Because consumers have reason to believe that your service is a long-term effective, is directed at the business with you. Is now, but "halfway out of the a Cheng Yaojin", people really accept the bad. cell phone jammers adopts the anti-explosive external die casting shell.
Assumption fees, China Unicom is also part of depriving the consumer's right to know. 8 of the Consumer Protection Act provides that: "Consumers enjoy aware of their purchase, use of goods or services received in real situation of the rights of consumers have the right to require the operator to provide goods according to the different circumstances of the goods or services, price, place of origin, producer, use, performance, specifications, grades, main ingredients, production date, expiration date, inspection and compliance verification, using the method statement, after-sales service, or services, content, specifications, cost and other relevant circumstances. above ordinance known as the mobile phone users, Unicom service. The shell of phone jammer can not be dismantled.
At least aware of the real situation of the services they receive, including: the specific content of services and service costs. Such as China Unicom argued that as there is no free caller ID of a legal obligation to provide users with, then talk about the process of conducting transactions with consumers, so that consumers understand, this free service is only temporary. to consumers, such a room for thought, perhaps some people it is no longer custom caller ID, or simply no longer buy a mobile phone. Unicom did not do so, is deprived of part of the consumer's right to know, so that consumers can not make the ideal decision. Charges Unicom in advance to inform consumers. For cell phone jammer system, all cell phone blocker shouldn’t be turned on generally.
If you do not free monthly fee to make the hearts of mobile phone users to understand in the end how many concessions. Otherwise, China Unicom made a "good thing", we do not know, China Unicom would become a "Huolei Feng". Unicom, a disguised restriction on the consumer's right to choose. "Consumer Protection Law, Article 9 provides that:" consumers will have the right to choice of commodities or services consumers the right to choose the operators of the goods or services, choose the types of products or services, independent decision to buy or not to to purchase any kind of goods, acceptance does not accept any of the services. "due to the monopoly of China Unicom and China Mobile in China, we are talking about mobile phone users to choose the service, it is unrealistic. cellphone jammer can be controlled point to point.
No comments:
Post a Comment